Abstract
This study examines how two teachers taught differentiation using a hand held computer algebra system, which made numerical,graphical and symbolic representations of the derivative readily available. The teachers planned the lessons together but taught their Year 11 classes in very different ways. They had fundamentally different conceptions of mathematics with associated teaching practices,innate ‘privileging’ of representations, and of technology use. This study links these instructional differences to the different differentiation competencies that the classes acquired. Students of the teacher who privileged conceptual understanding and student construction of meaning were more able to interpret derivatives. Students of the teacher who privileged performance of routines made better use of the CAS for solving routine problems. Comparison of the results with an earlier study showed that although each teacher's teaching approach was stable over two years, each used technology differently with further experience of CAS. The teacher who stressed understanding moved away from using CAS, whilst the teacher who stressed rules,adopted it more. The study highlights that within similar overall attainment on student tests, there can be substantial variations of what students know. New technologies provide more approaches to teaching and so greater variations between teaching and the consequent learning may become evident.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Dick, T.P. (1996). Much more than a toy. Graphing calculators in secondary school calculus. In P. Gomez and B. Waits (Eds), Roles of Calculators in the Classroom (pp. 31-46). Una Empressa Docente, USA.
Ellison, M. (1994). The Effect of Computer and Calculator Graphics on Students' Ability to Mentally Construct Calculus Concepts. (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Minnesota, 1993). Dissertation Abstracts International, 51/11, 4020.
Etlinger, L. (1974). The electronic calculator: A new trend in school mathematics. Educational Technology XIV(12): 43-45.
Fennema, E. and Franke, M. (1992). Teachers' knowledge and its impact. In D.A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp. 147-164). New York: Macmillan.
Heid, M.K. (1988). Resequencing skills and concepts in applied calculus using the computer as a tool. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 19(1): 3-25.
Hillel, J. (1993). Computer algebra systems as cognitive technologies: Implications for the practice of mathematics education. In C. Keitel and K. Ruthven (Eds), Learning from Computers: Mathematics Education and Technology (pp. 18-47). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Hoyles, C. (1992). Mathematics teaching and mathematics teachers: A meta-case study. For the Learning of Mathematics 12(3): 32-44.
Jost, K.L.E. (1992). The Implementation of Technology in the Calculus Classroom: An Examination of Teacher Beliefs, Practice and Curriculum Change. (Doctoral dissertation, Syracuse University, 1992). Dissertation Abstracts International, 53/06, 1876.
Keller, B., Russell, C. and Thompson, H. (1999). A large-scale study clarifying the roles of the TI-92 and instructional format on student success in calculus. International Journal of Computer Algebra in Mathematics Education 6(3): 191-207.
Kendal, M. and Stacey, K. (1999a). CAS, calculus and classrooms. In O. Zaslavsky (Ed.), Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. PME, Haifa, Israel, 3, pp. 129-136.
Kendal, M. and Stacey, K. (1999b) Varieties of teacher privileging for teaching calculus with computer algebra systems. International Journal of Computer Algebra in Mathematics Education 6(4): 233-247.
Kendal, M. and Stacey, K. (2000). Tracing learning of three representations of differentiation with the derivative competency framework. Research in Computer Algebra Systems in Schools Collected Papers. DSME Preprint 4/2000 20-38.
Kuhn, T. and Ball, D. (1986). Approaches to Teaching Mathematics: Mapping the Domains of Knowledge, Skills and Dispositions. East Lansing: Michigan State University, Center on Teacher Education.
Lagrange, J. (1999). Complex calculators in the classroom: Theoretical and practical reflections on teaching precalculus. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning 4: 51-81.
Noss, R. and Hoyles (1996). Windows on Mathematical Meanings: Learning Cultures and Computers. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
Palmiter, J. (1991). Effects of computer algebra systems on concept and skill acquisition in calculus. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 22(2): 151-156.
Penglase, M. and Arnold, S. (1996). The graphics calculator in mathematics education: A critical review of recent research. Mathematics Education Research Journal 8(1): 58-90.
Repo, S. (1994). Understanding and reflective abstraction: Learning the concept of derivative in a computer environment. International DERIVE Journal 1(1): 97-113.
Simmt, E. (1997). Graphing calculators in High School mathematics. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching 16(2/3): 269-289.
Tall, D. (1996). Functions and Calculus (Vol. 1). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
Tharp, M., Fitzsimmons, J. and Brown Ayers, R. (1997). Negotiating a technological shift: Teacher perception of the implementation of graphing calculators. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching 16(4): 551-575.
Thomas, M., Tyrrell, J. and Bullock, J. (1996). Using computers in the mathematics classroom: The role of the teacher. Mathematics Education Research Journal 8(1): 38-57.
Thompson, A.G. (1992). Teachers' beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research. In D.A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp. 127-146). New York: Macmillan.
Wertsch, J. (1990). The Voice of Rationality in a Sociocultural Approach to Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kendal, M., Stacey, K. The Impact of Teacher Privileging on Learning Differentiation with Technology. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning 6, 143–165 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017986520658
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017986520658